Allowed

Md. Quarban v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Oct 2019CR. MISC./63418/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners in anticipatory bail proceedings under the Cr.P.C. The court allowed release on bail subject to standard and additional conditions, noting allegations of false impulsion arising from a land dispute.

What did the court decide?

Release of petitioners on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Katihar, subject to specific conditions.

Md. Quarban Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63418 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-386 Year-2019 Thana- KATIHAR District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. QUARBAN Son of Md. Akbar @ Md. Putul Resident of Village - Balu Tola Sarifganj, P.S.- Katihar (Sahayak), District - Katihar.

¶5

Shahnawaj Son of Md. Akbar @ Md. Putul Resident of Village - Balu Tola Sarifganj, P.S.- Katihar (Sahayak), District - Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 21-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 342, 323, 427, 379, 506 and 436/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Katihar Town P.S.Case No. 386 of 2019.

¶14

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute as the parties are Gotias . The accusation of setting the house of the informant on fire is improbable as the said is said to have been made by tin tali and chappar . The petitioners are accused in one prior case of bailable nature.

¶15

Be that as it may, in the event of petitioners’ arrest or surrender before court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63418 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2

¶17

thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Katihar Town P.S.Case No. 386 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶18

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶19

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶20

(iii) That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶21

(iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶22

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶23

HR/-

¶24

U T

Md. Quarban v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Quarban v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanwa Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rafique Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ainul Haque @ Md. Ainul @ Md. Ainul Haque Vs The State of Bihar

Rajendra Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Gulab @ Intesar Vs the State of Bihar