The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 376, 420/34 IPC, subject to specific conditions.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63464 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. DistrictKishanganj
======================================================
GULAB @ INTESAR Son of Ajad @ Ajad Alam Resident of VillageFatehpur, Police Station- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Shekhar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 21-10-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63464 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2
antecedents.
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR under Sections 376 and 420/34 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gulab @ Intesar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
