Allowed

Umesh Raut v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Sept 2019CR. MISC./61515/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for offenses under Sections 498(A) IPC and others. The court relied on the petitioner's undertaking to treat his wife with dignity and protect her from humiliation. Bail was ordered conditional on a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties, one of whom must be the wife.

What did the court decide?

Grant of bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to the condition that one surety is the wife.

Umesh Raut Vs the State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61515 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2016 Thana- KHAJAULI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

UMESH RAUT S/o Binod Raut R/o village- Chandradih, P.S.- Khajauli, District- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, A.P.P.

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 27-09-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Khajouli P.S. Case No. 71 of 2016 (G.R. No. 756 of 2016) for the offenses under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with full honour and dignity and take care of her as a husband and protect her from any kind of humiliation or attack from other family members. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2019.

¶17

Considering the undertaking of the petitioner to keep his wife with full honor and dignity and take care of her interest, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61515 of 2019(2) dt.27-09-2019 2/2

¶19

petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Madhubani, in connection with Khajouli P.S. Case No. 71 of 2016 (G.R. No. 756 of 2016), subject to the condition that one of the bailors should be his wife.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶21

uma/-

¶22

U T

Umesh Raut v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Raut v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramayan Kumar Mahto @ Ramayan Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Kameshwar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Sandip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Nandan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar