This is an oral bail order where the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case alleging armed robbery and extortion by Maoists at a brick-kiln.
Release of petitioner on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6127 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2010 Thana- KARJA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Rohit Sahni @ Babloo S/o Musafir Sahni Resident of Village-Thathan Bujurg, P.S.-Sadar, District-Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 17-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 384, 386 of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of C.L.A. Act.
Allegedly, in the night of 07-08-2010, 25-30 miscreants having armed with weapons reached at his brick-kiln and demanded levy through letter in the name of Maoist.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 15-05-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. There is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. There is no recovery of any incriminating article
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6127 of 2019(4) dt.17-07-2019 2/2
from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired in this case in course of investigation.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Karja P.S. Case No. 125 of 2010.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner entitled to release on bail in a case involving levying of contributory tax by Maoists involving serious offences and AML Act charge.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rohit Sahni @ Babloo
The State of Bihar
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
