The court accorded permission to the petitioner to withdraw a criminal miscellaneous application after the trial concluded and the petitioner was convicted.
Permission to withdraw application accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3111 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2014 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Shankar Rai Neddhari Raim resident of village- Rustampur Tinpariya, Police station- Ragopur, District- Vaishali.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhola Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 17-07-2019 Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the
Court to withdraw this application as the trial has already concluded and the petitioner has been convicted by the Trial Court.
Permission is accorded.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
Shankar Rai Neddhari Raim
The State Of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
