Jakir Ansari v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a matter seeking anticipatory bail on charges of conspiracy to suicide under Sections 306/34 IPC, an oral order was passed. Bail was granted to petitioner No.2 but rejected for petitioner No.1, with the latter directed to surrender for regular bail.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected for Petitioner No.1; direction to surrender for regular bail. Prayer granted for Petitioner No.2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60180 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2019 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
- ======================================================
- JAKIR ANSARI Son of Late Gulam Rasul R/o Village- Bhatoria, P.S.Muffasil (Ranipatra), District- Purnea.
- Khalil Ansari @ Kalil Ansari Son of Jakir Ansari R/o Village- Bhatoria, P.S.Muffasil (Ranipatra), District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dinesh Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 in a case alleging conspiracy to suicide under Section 306/34 IPC.
Whether the allegations of illicit relationship and omission to help the deceased justify anticipatory bail for the accused.
In view of the post-mortem report indicating strangulation, whether the case falls under Section 302 or Section 306 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jakir Ansari
- petitioner
Khalil Ansari
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court