Allowed

Nandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2019CR. MISC./5969/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants bail to the petitioner in a rape case. The court considered the length of custody, lack of antecedents, and the relationship between the accused and the complainant, directing the petitioner to furnish bail bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount.

Nandan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5969 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2018 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Nandan Yadav Son of- Late Janakdeo Yadav Resident of village-Madhu Sarya p.s.-sidhwaliya distt.-Gopalganj

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prabhakar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 376(2)(1)(n) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation is that the petitioner developed physical relationship with the informant.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2018 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is alleged to be the Devar of the informant. As per the allegation, the petitioner had physical relationship with the informant since 2011. The petitioner got

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5969 of 2019(3) dt.18-04-2019 2/2

¶17

married in the year 2018. After the marriage, the informant has come with complaint case, which was registered as F.I.R. under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Gopalganj in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. case No.153 of 2018.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Nandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurabh Kumar Thakur @ Saurabh Thakur @ Saurabh Kumar @ Saurab Vs The State of Bihar

Shakra Khatoon @ Sakera Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Jay Vikas Kumar, Vs The State Of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shikandra Das @ Shikandar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar