Allowed

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2019CR. MISC./5925/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail application in a snatch case under Section 392 IPC. The petitioner, though in custody and with a charge sheet filed, was not named in the FIR. The court granted bail on furnishing securities to the satisfaction of the competent magistrate.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5925 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2018 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar Son of Paras Rai Resident of Village - Rahimpur, P.S.- Sonpur, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 18-04-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section

¶14

392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The prosecution case in brief is that while the informant was going to Karn Kodariya, his bag containing Tab, Biometric scanner and other belongings were snatched by the miscreants.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 26-07-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. No test identification parade was conducted in this case. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5925 of 2019(3) dt.18-04-2019 2/2

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 243 of 2018.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

A.K.V.//-

¶22

U T

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arun Rai @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurabh Kumar Thakur @ Saurabh Thakur @ Saurabh Kumar @ Saurab Vs The State of Bihar

Shakra Khatoon @ Sakera Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Jay Vikas Kumar, Vs The State Of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shikandra Das @ Shikandar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Nandan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar