Disposed

Sudama Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Sept 2019CR. MISC./59268/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court held that bail granted to petitioners was conditional on the victim's husband being in jail. Since the husband was not in jail, the previous order could not be enforced immediately. Petitioners were directed to renew the bail prayer after charges were framed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners allowed to renew bail prayer after framing of charges; trial court directed to frame charges at earliest.

Sudama Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59268 of 2019

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52359 of 2019

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2014 Thana- SAHPUR District- Patna

¶5

======================================================

¶6

SUDAMA MAHTO, S/o Beni Mahto @ Shivdani Mahto

¶7

Ashok Mahto, S/o Beni Mahto @ Shivdani Mahto, Both R/o village - Daudpur Bind Toli, P.O. + P.S. - Sahpur, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanchay Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 25-09-2019 Heard.

¶15

The petitioners were allowed bail in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 108 of 2014, a case under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code on 26.08.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 52359 of 2019. The bail was granted because submission was that husband of the victim was already in jail and the petitioners are brother of the father of the husband.

¶16

The order was specific that if the husband of the victim is already in jail, the bail bond of the petitioners would be accepted by the learned court below.

¶17

Now it has been informed that husband of the victim is not in jail, therefore, the petitioners cannot be released in pursuance of order dated 26.08.2019 above.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59268 of 2019(2) dt.25-09-2019 2/2

¶19

The petitioners are at liberty to renew fresh prayer for

¶20

bail after framing of the charges.

¶21

The learned court below is directed to frame the charge against the petitioners at the earliest even after separating the trial of the petitioners.

¶22

Let this order be communicated to the Court of learned 1^st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 108 of 2014.

¶23

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶25

Kundan/-

¶26

U T

Sudama Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudama Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niru Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Vishnudeo Chaudhary @ Vishundeo Chaudhary and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nujahat Praveen Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Sharma @ Ajay Sharma @ Kamlesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar