Disposed

Jugul Sah @ Jugul Kishore v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Nov 2019CR. MISC./58865/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court clarified that the bail order dated 08.11.2019 was incomplete regarding petitioner No. 5. The court modified the order to explicitly grant anticipatory bail to petitioners No. 2, 3, and 5, previously omitted, under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Order dated 08.11.2019 modified to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners 2, 3, and 5 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Jugul Sah @ Jugul Kishore Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58865 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JUGUL SAH @ JUGUL KISHORE Son of Nathuni Sah Resident of Village - Bhiksha Ram, Tetariya, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

¶5

Lal Bahadur Sah Son of Nathuni Sah Resident of Village - Bhiksha Ram, Tetariya, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

¶6

Nathuni Sah Son of Late Manu Sah Resident of Village - Bhiksha Ram, Tetariya, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

¶7

Raj Kumar Sah @ Raj Kumar Son of Jugul Sah @ Jugul Kishore Resident of Village - Bhiksha Ram, Tetariya, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

¶8

Harelal Sah @ Lala Shah Son of Late Manu Sah Resident of Village - Bhiksha Ram, Tetariya, P.S.- Kateya, Distt - Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance :

¶15

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh

¶16

======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

4 20-11-2019 This case has been listed today under the heading

¶20

“To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioners.

¶21

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners is that vide order dated 08.11.2019, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos. 1 and 4 were rejected and petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 5 were allowed the privilege of anticipatory bail, however, there is no mentioning with regard to petitioner no. 5 in the said order.

¶22

Perused the order dated 08.11.2019 and also enquired

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58865 of 2019(4) dt.20-11-2019 2/2

¶24

from the diary maintained by the Court Master and it appears that learned counsel for the petitioners is right in his submission, as such, second last paragraph of order dated 08.11.2019 is modified to the extent that the same be read as under:-

¶25

So far petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 5, above named, are concerned, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below, they will be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM -XV, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 227/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶26

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the concerned court below forthwith.

¶27

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶28

sunilkumar/-

¶29

U T

Jugul Sah @ Jugul Kishore v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jugul Sah @ Jugul Kishore v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aman Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Bhuvar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Singh Bhokta Vs The State of Bihar