Allowed

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Sept 2019CR. MISC./58353/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted provisional bail to the petitioner, falsely implicated in electricity theft, contingent upon depositing the assessed loss in installments and complying with specific conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner shall be released on provisional bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and depositing the total loss of Rs. 65,535/- in three installments.

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58353 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2019 Thana- AMBA DistrictAurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARJUN KUMAR @ ARJUN PASWAN S/o Etwaru Paswan R/o villageKasauti, P.S.- Amba, District- Aurangabad

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Abhishek Kumar S/o Sawali Ram R/o village- Dayalpur, P.S.- Janta Bazar, District- Saran, At present posted as Assistant Electric Engineer, Vidut Apurti Branch, Kutumba, Aurangbad

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ajay Kumar Gautam, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 17-09-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 188 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of Bihar Electricity Act registered in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 66 of 2019.

¶17

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with alleged theft of electricity as the petitioner failed to take a commercial connection for the general store running in his house. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner expresses his readiness to deposit of Rs. 65,535/- by

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58353 of 2019(2) dt.17-09-2019 2/3

¶19

way of loss assessed to have been caused to the Power Company,

¶20

in instalments.

¶21

Learned counsel for the Power Company appears and has been heard.

¶22

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Electricity), Magadh Area, Gaya in connection with Amba P.S. Case No. 66 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶23

(i) That the petitioner shall deposit the total amount of Rs. 65,535/- in the Court below in three equated monthly instalments, of which the first instalment shall be paid on or before 15^th October, 2019, which shall abide by the final result of the trial.

¶24

(ii) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶25

(iii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶26

(iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58353 of 2019(2) dt.17-09-2019 3/3

¶28

available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State

¶29

shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶30

(v) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶31

The provisional bail shall stand confirmed upon deposit of the entire amount by the petitioner within the stipulated period. It is made clear that default in making payment of two consecutive instalments shall result in automatic cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

¶32

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶33

Ibrar//-

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Mustakim @ Mustakim Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Rita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Saurabh @ Jaki Dubey @ Jaiki Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Ankesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kiran Agarwal Vs the State of Bihar