Partly allowed

Ranjit Rai @ Ranjeet Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2019CR. MISC./57660/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court modified a bail condition in a criminal miscellaneous application. The earlier order erroneously alleged antecedents under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act when offences were under the Indian Penal Code. The condition was modified to release the petitioner on furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed to modify the bail condition; petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bond as per the order dated 09.08.2019.

Ranjit Rai @ Ranjeet Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57660 of 2019

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49929 of 2019

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2019 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶5

======================================================

¶6

RANJIT RAI @ RANJEET RAI S/o Modi Rai @ Modi Ray Resident of Village- Jakhara, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-12-2019

¶11

This application is for modification of order dated 09.08.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49929 of 2019, whereby the petitioner was allowed bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2019, with condition that the petitioner would be released if the trial is not concluded within six months from the date of framing of the charge.

¶12

Modification has been sought for on the ground that in the earlier bail application, it was wrongly stated that the petitioner is having a criminal antecedent of commission of offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, whereas, in fact, the petitioner has got no prior case under the Excise Act, rather the said case was for offences under Sections 147, 148, 353, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The recovery of liquor was from the field side.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57660 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2

¶15

Considering the facts of this case, the condition of order dated 09.08.2019 is modified with direction that the petitioner be released, at once, on furnishing bail bond as directed in the order dated 09.08.2019.

¶16

Accordingly, this modification application is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶17

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge Excise, Samastipur/successor court in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2019.

¶18

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶19

Kundan/-

¶20

U T

Ranjit Rai @ Ranjeet Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Rai @ Ranjeet Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Niraj Kumar @ Guddu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vidyabhushan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar @ Satendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sarafat Dhannu @ Sharafat @ Dhannu Vs the State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Kumar Singh @ Mantu Singh Vs The State of Bihar