The single-judge High Court rejected the petitioner's bail prayer in a criminal matter. The court held that the prayer must be rejected due to the petitioner's intentional withholding of criminal antecedents until exposure by the prosecution.
Prayer for bail was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56808 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2017 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran
======================================================
TABARAKH ANSARI @ TABARAK ANSARI Son of Manib Ansari Resident of Village - Semari Bhawanipur, P.S.- Jogapatti (Nawalpur), Distt - West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amarendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 11-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
learned APP.
Considering the conduct of the petitioner, who intentionally withheld his criminal antecedents till the period having been exposed by the prosecution party, prayer for bail is rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be rejected considering the petitioner's conduct of withholding criminal antecedents.
Whether the petitioner's delay in disclosing criminal antecedents affects the grant of bail.
Tabarakh Ansari @ Tabarak Ansari
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
