The single judge dismissed the criminal memo of appeal, holding there was no plausible reason to interfere with the impugned judgment below. The appeal was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (U/S) No.3 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 C Year-2005 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul
======================================================
BHOLA PRASAD SAH son of Late Shanti Sah, Resident of VillageDagmara Tola Piprahi, Police Station- kunauli, District- Supaul.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar For the State : Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
APP for the State.
Having gone through the judgment impugned, there happens to be no plausible reason for interfering with the same.
Consequent thereupon, the memo of appeal is
rejected.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
HR/-
U T
Bhola Prasad Sah
The State of Bihar
Shambhu Sah
Gyani Devi
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
