Allowed

Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC10 Jul 2019CR. MISC./5628/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 498A IPC and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Conditions included monthly maintenance payments and bail bond submission.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same, subject to monthly maintenance payments and conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Chandan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5628 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Singh son of Vijay Singh Resident of village- Dhongra, P.S. Amba, District Aurangabad (Bihar)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar

¶8

Soni Kumari wife of chandan Singh, Daughter of Suchit Singh, resident of village- Dhongra, at Present resident of Aanjantole Rathaur Bigha, P.s.Madanpur, District- Aurangabad

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Leelawati Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

6 10-07-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner, complainant

¶16

and APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner being the husband of the complainant,

¶18

is apprehending arrest in a complaint case, wherein process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 323 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶19

The prosecution case as per the complainant Soni Kumari is to the effect that the complainant was married with the petitioner on 23.4.2017 but subsequent to the marriage, further dowry demand of Rupees Fifty Thousand cash, a refrigerater and a motorcycle was made and due to non fulfillment of the same, torture was inflicted upon the complainant by the petitioner and other family members.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5628 of 2019(6) dt.10-07-2019 2/4

¶21

The petitioner and the complainant are present in

¶22

Court.

¶23

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner admits his marriage with the complainant, having no issue. The petitioner made several attempts to reconcile the issue but when the complainant declined to resume the conjugal life, the petitioner filed Matrimonial Suit No. 6 of 2018 which is pending before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court Aurangabad and thereafter the complaint was filed on 15.3.2018. It is further submitted that the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour.

¶24

However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the complainant that the complainant is not ready to accept the offer of the petitioner as she is apprehensive due to past conduct of the petitioner.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner works as a labourer in a shop and claims to earn Rs.3,000/- per month hence he is ready to make payment of Rs.1,500/- per month to the complainant from August, 2019 by depositing the same in her bank account by second week of every succeeding month. However, the complainant is not

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5628 of 2019(6) dt.10-07-2019 3/4

¶27

satisfied with the quantum of monthly payment.

¶28

The learned counsel for the complainant, on instructions, submits that the complainant reluctantly accepts the offer of the petitioner and is ready to submit her bank detail number within a period of three weeks from today by filing the same on affidavit before the learned court below.

¶29

Considering the present stand of the parties, in order to save the complainant, for the present, from destitution and vagrancy with a lurking hope that the issue may reconcile in future, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within 12 weeks on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Aurangabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 208 of 2018 subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶30

The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or collateral proceedings.

¶31

Three consecutive defaults in making payment will give liberty to the complainant to file application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

¶32

The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties

¶33

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5628 of 2019(6) dt.10-07-2019 4/4

¶34

to resolve the issue otherwise.

¶35

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶36

anil/-

¶37

Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Singh @ Raju Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ratnesh Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Laxman Choudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Kaushalya Kunwar Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Santu Mistry @ Santoo Mistry @ Sujit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Subodh Sah @ Subodh Prasad Sah Vs The State of Bihar