, the High Court at Patna dismissed an application for anticipatory bail filed by Santu Mistry in a criminal proceeding, ruling the matter on the grounds of non-prosecution with no parties present in court.
Application for anticipatory bail in PS Case No. 95 of 2012 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4152 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2012 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad
======================================================
Santu Mistry @ Santoo Mistry @ Sujit Kumar, Son of Janardan Mistry, resident of village- Dharnaee, PS- Makhdumpur, District- Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
Accordingly, the present application, filed for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 95 of 2012, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad, is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
DKS/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail should be allowed in the circumstances present during the hearing.
Santu Mistry @ Santoo Mistry @ Sujit Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Sunita Devi
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
