Allowed

Mahesh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2019CR. MISC./56206/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants bail to the petitioner, Mahesh Sah, in a case under Section 394 IPC. The court noted the absence of witness tampering allegations and lack of recovery. Relying on similar grants to co-accused, bail was allowed upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Mahesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56206 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-227 Year-2018 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahesh Sah Son of Kishun Sah Resident of Village- Hadhadiya, P.S.Laxmipur, District- Jamui (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the State : Renu Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-09-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant was robbed of his valuables by four accused persons, riding on two motorcycles.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 27-03-2019. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. His name transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, Sajan Kumar. There is no recovery of any incriminating article from possession of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56206 of 2019(2) dt.04-09-2019 2/2

¶18

petitioner. He has not been put on test identification parade. The other co-accuseds with similar allegation have been granted bail by coordinate benches of this court vide orders dated 29-042019 and 28-08-2019 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 14860 of 2019 and 35557 of 2019 respectively.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 227 of 2018.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

A.K.V.//-

¶23

U T

Mahesh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raban Paswan @ Raman Paswan @ Rabam Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sajan Vs the State of Bihar

Rajnesh Jha @ Rajnesh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar