Allowed

Rajnesh Jha @ Rajnesh Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Sept 2019CR. MISC./55382/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No.55382 of 2019, the Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail in a case concerning the recovery of illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, upon furnishment of a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

Rajnesh Jha @ Rajnesh Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55382 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2019 Thana- SHAMBHUGANJ District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJNESH JHA @ RAJNESH KUMAR JHA, Son of Abhadh Kishore Jha, aged about 35 years, Male, Resident of Village-Chatrahar, P.S.- Shambhuganj, Distt - Banka, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Parmanand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 03-09-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is languishing in custody since 28.07.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 7.02 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

¶13

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 7.02 liters wine is recovered. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55382 of 2019(2) dt.03-09-2019 2/2

¶15

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II/Special Judge, Excise, Banka, in connection with Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 109 of 2019.

¶17

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶18

U.K./-

¶19

U T

Rajnesh Jha @ Rajnesh Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnesh Jha @ Rajnesh Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjay Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Banarsi Devi @ Banarshi Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raban Paswan @ Raman Paswan @ Rabam Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sajan Vs the State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar Vs the State of Bihar