Dismissed

Pardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Mar 2019CR. MISC./5549/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Blanket anticipatory bail application in connection with offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 354(B) IPC for misbehaving with a minor. The single judge rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail but directed surrender for regular bail consideration within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; direction to surrender within six weeks to seek regular bail.

Pardeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5549 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

Pardeep Kumar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 27-03-2019 Heard the parties.

¶12

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with the Mahila P.S.Case No. 85 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 3375 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 and 354 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation as per F.I.R. against the petitioner is that the petitioner misbehaved with the informant, who is minor.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and there was delay in lodging the F.I.R. without giving any plausible reason and the police has submitted charge sheet against the petitioner along with two other F.I.R. named accused persons and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5549 of 2019(3) dt.27-03-2019 2/2

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as the informant, who

¶17

opposes the prayer for bail.

¶18

Having considered the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, Accordingly, prayer of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court and if possible to be disposed of on same day.

¶19

This application is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

sudha/-

¶22

U T

Pardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghuvansh Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Sushila Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Om Prakash Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravi Shankar Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Paswan @ Sanjay Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar