Allowed

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC30 Aug 2019CR. MISC./54332/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sudhir Singh granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving robbery and explosives offences, directing him to furnish bail bonds and sureties before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai. Certificate.

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54332 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2019 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MAHESH YADAV @ UMESH YADAV Son of Bhuneshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Kundar, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Renu Kumari ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 30-08-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of Explosive Substance Act.

¶14

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused persons variously armed on the point of gun looted ornaments and cash from the house of the informant and also assaulted family members.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 24.3.2019. Chargesheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is alleged

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54332 of 2019(2) dt.30-08-2019 2/2

¶17

that the looted articles are said to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge that the articles in question are looted articles. The looted articles have not been put on TIP to ascertain whether the said are looted or not. The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 211/2019.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Pankaj/-

¶22

U T

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brajesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sajan Kumar @ Sajan Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Manjay Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Banarsi Devi @ Banarshi Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Mahesh Yadav @ Umesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar