Allowed

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC28 Aug 2019CR. MISC./29517/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition is a bail application under Section 392 IPC. The petitioner, initially unknown in the FIR, was identified only through self-confession. The High Court granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui.

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29517 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2018 Thana- LAXMIPUR District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Das Resident of Village - Mohanpur, Matia, P.S.- Laxmipur, District - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabi Bhushan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand Tiwary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 28-08-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation is that two unknown miscreants on the point of pistol snatched Rs.50,000/- and mobile of the informant.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2018. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has transpired in this case on his self confession. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest his implication in this case. There is no

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29517 of 2019(4) dt.28-08-2019 2/2

¶18

recovery of looted articles from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has not been put on T.I.P.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Laxmipur (Gidhaur) P.S. case No.204 of 2018.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

Narendra/-

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajan Kumar Das @ Sajan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganga Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Megh Nath Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Mandal @ Pradeep Manjhi Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sajan Kumar @ Sajan Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Uttam Paswan Vs The State of Bihar