Allowed

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2019CR. MISC./52902/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC relating to snatching of a gold locket, directing furnishing of bail bonds and surety bonds to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52902 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2019 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIKASH KUMAR Son of Saryug Sahani @ Saryug Kewat Resident of Ranipur Kalisthan , P.S. - Mehdiganj, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Kumar Mritunjay Narain For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 23-08-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Prosecution allegation, in short, is that the accused persons was caught snatching gold locket.

¶17

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 18.4.2019 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Due to mistake of fact, he has been made accused. The allegations made in the F.I.R. is denied by the petitioner. The case is triable by the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52902 of 2019(2) dt.23-08-2019 2/2

¶19

Magistrate.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 327 of 2019.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

Pankaj/-

¶24

U T

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Amlesh Kumar @ Vimlesh Singh @Vimlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhakar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar