Allowed

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Aug 2019CR. MISC./14411/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a bail application by ordering the release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each for the Sessions Trial arising out of the offense of dowry death under Section 304B IPC.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14411 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2012 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar Son of Bokai Yadav, Resident of VillageChakai, P.S.-Jokihat, District-Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Atul Chandra ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

6 22-08-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 304B, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and caused death of the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 04-09-2018. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. For a petty reason, a dispute took place between the family members. The deceased is said to have

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14411 of 2019(6) dt.22-08-2019 2/2

¶18

committed suicide as the same is evident from paragraphs 23, 24, 25, 39, 40 & 41 of the case diary. No offence u/S 304B of the Indian Penal Code is made out.

¶19

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-Ist, Araria in connection with Sessions Trial No. 271 of 2018 arising out of Jokihat P.S. Case No. 210 of 2012.

¶21

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶22

A.K.V.//-

¶23

U T

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Yadav @ Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anirudh Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Sah@Vikash Kumar@Bikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Prakash @ Mallu Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Munna @ Motu Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amlesh Kumar @ Vimlesh Singh @Vimlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar