High Court at Patna dismissed the petitioner's bail petition in a criminal case under Section 392 IPC, noting he was in custody and order directed renewal after framing of charge.
Petitioner to be at liberty to renew prayer for bail after framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.509 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2017 Thana- AIRPORT DistrictPatna
======================================================
Deepak Kumar Yadav @ Deepak Kumar Son of Sikandar Rai Resident of Village-Bhagwanpur,P.S. Ishuwapur,Distt.-Chhapra
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
6 15-05-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the offence under Section 392 IPC at this stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Kumar Yadav @ Deepak Kumar
The State Of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
