Dismissed

Anand Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC14 May 2019CR. MISC./22538/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's anticipatory bail petition. The Court held that the petitioner was not inclined to be granted bail due to his deliberate failure to cooperate and his failure to fulfill a previous undertaking to settle the dispute arising from a dowry allegation.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail petition was dismissed, and the petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences.

Anand Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22538 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1022 Year-2014 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna

¶3

====================================================== Anand Kumar Jha (Male) age about 32 years, S/o- Lambodar Jha R/o VillageBaliya, Post- Teesee Narasam, P.S.- Beni Pattee, District- Madhubani. At Present Resident Amreet Dham, Building No. 10, Room No. 302, Near Yogidham Gauri Pada Kalyan West, P.S.- Kharak Para, District Thane Maharastra, Pin- 421301.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Shweta Kumari Jha (Female), age 27 years, D/o- Vinod Kumar Jah R/oKaligawan, P.S.- Singhwada, District- Darbhanga, at present Mohalla- New Mithila Colony near Sant Domanik School Biscute Factory Shiv Nasariganj Parwati Kunj, P.O. and P.S.- Danapur, Patna.

¶8

... ... Opposite Partirs

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, APP For Opp. Party No. 2 : Mt. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 14-05-2019

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 1022 (C) of 2014.

¶13

None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. The matter was passed over yesterday when the petitioner had not appeared.

¶14

Learned counsel for the complainant appears and opposes the anticipatory bail petition, submitting that the petitioner is deliberately not cooperating. Reference is invited to the order dated 17.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 3190 of 2016 wherein the petitioner along with other persons had sought quashing of the complaint and had held out that the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the court. The petitioner had expressed his readiness to pay Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs) by way of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22538 of 2019(3) dt.14-05-2019 2/2

¶16

demand draft to the complainant on or before 5^th December, 2017. By subsequent order dated 06.09.2018 in the said case it was noted that last chance was given to settle the dispute but the dispute could not be settled. It is stated that the petitioner has still not made any payment to the complainant despite his undertaking before the court as stated above.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the complainant and having regard to the nature of complaint and conduct of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.

¶18

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶19

BT/-

¶20

U T

Anand Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Kumar Jha v. The State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Sahani @ Ramesh Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Datta Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Sharan Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Trilok Kumar @ Triloki Kumar Vs The State of Bihar