An oral order in a petition for anticipatory bail. The High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissed the prayer for anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC, recording that the matter was dismissed for want of prosecution.
The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48140 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-936 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Araria
======================================================
SURESH MEHTAR, Son of Late Shibu Mehtar Resident of Shivpuri Mohalla, Ward No.09, Bijli Karyalaya, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Satyavrat Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However,
learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 is present.
Accordingly, the present application filed with a prayer for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 936 C of 2018 filed with accusation for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 494 and 498A/34 of the I.P.C., pending before the learned CJM, Araria is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Ashwini/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be allowed given the want of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suresh Mehtar
The State of Bihar
Anita Devi
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
