Allowed

Md. Gulab v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Dec 2019CR. MISC./58902/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted anticipatory bail to six petitioners in a complaint case involving IPC offences sections 341, 323, 354, 376/511, 504/34. Order considered compromise withdrawal and concluded investigation.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender within 12 weeks, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Md. Gulab Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58902 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2019 Thana- MANIYARI District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Gulab, Son of Mehadi Hasan @ Mehandi Hussain Resident of VillageMornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

Md. Samsad, Son of Md. Ali Hussain Resident of Village- Mornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶6

Md. Naushad, Son of Md. Ali Hussain Resident of Village- Mornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶7

Md. Ali Hussain, Son of Late Md. Ibrahim Resident of Village- Mornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶8

Mehadi Hasan @ Mehandi Hussain, Son of Late Md. Ibrahim Resident of Village- Mornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶9

Md. Najeer, Son of Late Md. Ibrahim, Resident of Village- Mornisf Naya Tola, P.S.- Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶16

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 376/511 and 504/34 of the IPC.

¶17

The prosecution case is to the effect that on 15.11.2018 at about 7.00 A.M., the informant went to ease out, but in the meantime, petitioner no.1, Md. Gulab and petitioner no.2, Md.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58902 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 2/3

¶19

Samshad caught her and started kissing her and also made an attempt to ravish the informant. Subsequently, on alarm being raised, when the nearby people assembled, they escaped from the scene. It is further alleged that when the informant’s family met with petitioners’ family, then all the accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant and her sisterin-law.

¶20

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that most of the petitioners are neighbour of the informant and due to earlier enmity, the accusation has been levelled against the petitioners. It is further alleged that for the alleged occurrence of 15.11.2018, the complaint case was filed on 19.12.2018, which came to be registered as a police case, after the same being transferred under Section 156(3) of the Cr. P.C., on 10.03.2019, but prior to the registration of FIR, the informant retracted from her initial version and on 16.01.2019, she filed compromisecum-withdrawal petition for the present case before the learned Court below. Moreover, medical examination of the informant has not been conducted. A statement has been made in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedent.

¶21

Learned APP, after going through the case diary, submits

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58902 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 3/3

¶23

that all the petitioners are named in the FIR and the accusation is specific against petitioner nos. 1 and 2.

¶24

Considering the delayed lodging of the case, filing of compromise-cum-withdrawal petition by the informant prior to the registration of FIR before the learned Court below and investigation already being concluded, coupled with fact that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedent, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1^st Class, West Muzaffarpur in connection with Maniyari P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶25

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶26

Amrendra/-

¶27

U T

Md. Gulab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Gulab v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamshed Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Yadav @ Bittu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Anjula Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Subh Laxmi Prasad Vs the Central Bureau of Investogation through the Inspector of Police, the Investigation Officer