Allowed

Bijay Khan @ Bijay Kumar Khan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Sept 2019CR. MISC./46297/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous matter concerns a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Bijay Khan in relation to an offence under multiple IPC sections. The Court granted bail on the petitioner's surrender or arrest within four weeks, noting he was not an absconder.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted privilege of anticipatory bail to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Bijay Khan @ Bijay Kumar Khan Vs the State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46297 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2010 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BIJAY KHAN @ BIJAY KUMAR KHAN Son of Late Indra Mohan Khan Cashier at Central Bank of India, M.L.T. College Branch, Saharsa, permanent Resident of Village - Bangaon West, P.S.- Bangaon, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 26-09-2019

¶11

Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 286 of 2010 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 409, 120B and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner, At the outset, informed this Court that this case is of the year 2010 but then it has also been informed that till date the petitioner has not been declared absconder and no process under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. has been issued against the petitioner.

¶15

Learned counsel further submitted that on the merit of the allegations there is no specific case against the petitioner and the petitioner being a member of the Board of Directors may be

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46297 of 2019(3) dt.26-09-2019 2/3

¶17

granted privilege of anticipatory bail when the Chief Executivecum-Chairman of the Co-operative Society has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.07.2017 (Annexure ‘3’). Learned counsel submits that even recently on 01.05.2019 another learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court despite taking note of the fact that the case is of the yer 2010 granted privilege of anticipatory bail to one Md. Humau who claims to be an agent of the society vide Cr. Misc. no. 14499 of 2019.

¶18

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

¶19

However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the petitioner has not been declared absconder so far and the Chief Executive of the Society as also other coaccused have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 286 of 2010 be released on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 15,000/(fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46297 of 2019(3) dt.26-09-2019 3/3

¶22

the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

¶23

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶25

(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.

¶26

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶27

avin/-

¶28

U T

Bijay Khan @ Bijay Kumar Khan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijay Khan @ Bijay Kumar Khan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushboo Gupta Vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of India Through Executive Director C R M and Ors.

Rajan Shukla @ Rajan Kumar Shukla Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Mala Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Akhouri Gopal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Baba @ Istekhar Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar