Partly allowed

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Sept 2019CR. MISC./46060/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner nos. 2 and 3 subject to standard conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. However, anticipatory bail was denied to petitioner no. 1 due to the specific allegation of a deliberate assault with a farsa blow, instead granting him a time limit to seek regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner nos. 2 and 3 subject to conditions; petitioner no. 1 directed to surrender and pray for regular bail within four weeks.

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46060 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- JADOPUR District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh Son of Sunil Singh, Resident of Village - Masan Thana, P.S.- Jadopur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

¶5

Raju Kumar @ Raju Singh Son of Sunil Singh, Resident of Village - Masan Thana, P.S.- Jadopur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

¶6

Sunil Singh Son of Late Bacha Rai, Resident of Village - Masan Thana, P.S.Jadopur, Dist.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 26-09-2019

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶16

APP for the State.

¶17

Petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties are Pattidars and there is a land dispute between the parties. There are general and omnibus allegations against petitioners and there is also a counter case.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, wherein there is an allegation against the petitioner no. 1 Ravi

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46060 of 2019(3) dt.26-09-2019 2/3

¶21

Kumar that he had assaulted Sri Bhagwan Singh by giving a farsa blow on his head, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner no. 1, in case he surrenders in the court below and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on the basis of materials available on the record without being prejudiced by the order of this Court, and further consideration being given to the nature of injury and the contention is that there is a land dispute between the parties.

¶22

So far as petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are concerned, since there are general and omnibus allegations against them and there is a counter case, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Gopalganj in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. i.e.

¶23

(i) a condition that the person shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶24

(ii) a condition that the person shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46060 of 2019(3) dt.26-09-2019 3/3

¶26

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from

¶27

disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶28

(iii) a condition that the person shall not leave India

¶29

without the previous permission of the Court.

¶30

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶31

vats/ved

¶32

U T

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khushboo Gupta Vs The Life Insurance Corporation Of India Through Executive Director C R M and Ors.

Rajan Shukla @ Rajan Kumar Shukla Vs The State of Bihar

Kanchan Mala Vs The State of Bihar

Sri Akhouri Gopal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijay Khan @ Bijay Kumar Khan Vs the State of Bihar

Baba @ Istekhar Alam Vs The State of Bihar