Allowed

Baliram Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Apr 2019CR. MISC./4514/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order relates to bail in an IPC case. The court granted bail to the petitioner, who had been in custody for five years with no criminal antecedent and no allegations of witness tampering, on furnishing sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned F.T.C. I, Motihari.

Baliram Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4514 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2014 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Baliram Bhagat son of Mahendra Bhagat, Resident of Village- Sugav Badhaitola, P.S.- Sugauli, District- East Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 03-04-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 to the present application. This is the third attempt for grant of bail filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2014 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has remained in custody for approximately five years. The deceased is said to have committed suicide. As per the report received from the trial court, there is no chance of trial being concluded

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4514 of 2019(3) dt.03-04-2019 2/2

¶17

in near future. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrnece.

¶18

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. He is the husband of the deceased.

¶19

Considering the period undergone by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned F.T.C. I, Motihari in connection with S.Tr. No.147 of 2015 arising out of Sugauli P.S. case No.72 of 2014.

¶20

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶21

Narendra/-

¶22

U T

Baliram Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baliram Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Narayan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Satya Narain Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Singh @ Raushan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar