Allowed

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah v. the Union of India and Ors.

Patna HC2 Apr 2019CWJC/5566/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This interlocutory order deals with an application for impleading a minor and his guardian as respondents in a writ petition concerning Aadhar card data. The High Court allowed the application, impleading the minor and guardian, and directed the petitioner to file a representation before the Patna UIDAI office for inquiry into the father's column entry.

What did the court decide?

Prakash Kumar and Sanju Devi impleaded as respondent nos. 7 and 8; petitioner directed to file detailed representation before Respondent No. 6 for inquiry.

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5566 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah S/o Krishn Mohan Sah R/o VillageSarmaspur,P.S. Kanti,Dist.-Muzaffartpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union Of India through the Planning Secretary,Govt. of India,New Delhi

¶7

The Planning Secretary, Govt. of India,New Delhi

¶8

The Director General, Unique Identification Authority of India,Planning Commission,Govt. of India,Connaught Place,New Delhi

¶9

The Deputy Director, Unique Identification Authority of India,7th Floor Aadhar Building Kali Mandir,Goal Market,New Delhi-110001

¶10

The Deputy Director, UIDAI Regional Office,Ist Floor RIADA Office Cerntral Building,Nankum Industrial Area,Near STPI,Lowadih,RanchiJharkhand-834010

¶11

The Deputy Director, Unique Identification Authority of India 4th Lalit Bhawan J.L. Nehru Marg,Patna Bihar

¶12

7 Prakash Kumar (Minor, s/o- Sanju Devi, resident of Harpur Balara, P.S.Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur, presently residing at village Sehhan, P.S.Cheharakala (Goroul), District- Vaishali under the guardianship of his mother Sanju Devi

¶13

8 Sanju Devi, daughter of Bigan Sah, resident of Harpur Balara, P.S.Maniyari, District- Muzaffarpur, presently residing at village Sehhan, P.S.Cheharakala (Goroul), District- Vaishali.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.S.D.Sanjay (Adsg) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 02-04-2019 Re. I.A. No. 1 of 2019

¶17

The present interlocutory application has been filed for impleading Prakash Kumar ( minor son of Sanju Devi) and Sanju Devi (daughter of Bigan Sah) as respondent nos. 7 and 8 to the writ application.

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.5566 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/3

¶19

Considering the grounds made in the application and the submissions made in support thereof, the present I.A. application is allowed. Prakash Kumar and Sanju Devi are impleaded as respondent nos. 7 and 8 to the present writ application.

¶20

I.A. No. 1/2019 stands disposed of.

¶21

Heard the parties.

¶22

The petitioner has filed the present writ application for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to remove the name of the petitioner forthwith from the father’s column of Prakash Kumar from Aadhar Card No. 5528 2616 4849. The petitioner has further prayed for holding an inquiry as to under whose instance the name of the petitioner was recorded in the father’s column of said Prakash Kumar in Aadhar Card No. 5528 2616 4849.

¶23

Considering the grievance raised in the present writ application, the petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation/application before the respondent no. 6 (The Deputy Director, UIDAI, 4^th Lalit Bhawan, J.L. Nehru Marg, Patna, Bihar) within a period of 30 days from today and after hearing all the concerned parties, necessary order be passed by the competent authority within a period of four months from the

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.5566 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 3/3

¶25

date of filing of such representation/application.

¶26

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the present writ

¶27

application stands disposed of.

¶28

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶29

Pankaj/-

¶30

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Sah v. the Union of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kapildev Singh and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

M/S Radha Krishna Sewa Sansthan Trust Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Naresh Singh, Vs The State of Bihar

Vikas Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Narayan Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Pan Babu Kewat Vs The State of Bihar