The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving matrimonial disputes and alleged offences under the IPC and D.P. Act, requiring a bond and sureties.
Release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41966 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas
======================================================
RAJNI KANT MISHRA Son of Sachida Nand Mishra Resident of Village - Sohwaliya, P.S.- Kochas, P.O. Kopasar, District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Narsingh Tanti ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
ORAL ORDER
2 09-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41966 of 2019(2) dt.09-07-2019 2/2
with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Dehri, in connection with Rohtas Mahila P.S. Case No. 40/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted anticipatory bail apprehending arrest for offences under the IPC and D.P. Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajni Kant Mishra
The State of Bihar
Dipmala Devi
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
