Allowed

Gopi Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2019CR. MISC./41790/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest in PS Case No. 83/2018 involving IPC offences including assault and theft. The court imposed standard bail conditions requiring sureties, no commission of fresh offences, and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each under Section 438 Cr.P.C. subject to specific conditions.

Gopi Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41790 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2018 Thana- ARIYARI DistrictSheikhpura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

GOPI MAHTO, male, aged about 38 years, Son of Hira Mahto Resident of Village - Navi Nagar Kakrar, P.S.- Ariyari, Dist.- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-07-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341. 323. 324. 379, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 83 of 2018.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of retaliation to the earlier F.I.R. bearing Ariyari P.S. Case No. 123 of 2015 lodged by the petitioner’s side. The specific accusation of assault is against other co-accused and such accusation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. There is no material on record to indicate any injury caused to him. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶14

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner’s arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41790 of 2019(2) dt.08-07-2019 2/2

¶16

Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 83 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions -

¶17

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶18

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

Ibrar/BT

¶23

U T

Gopi Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopi Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Dayal Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Kumar Ravi Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Sah @ Ashok Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar