Allowed

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jul 2019CR. MISC./41850/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges under multiple IPC sections related to assault and grievous hurt. Bail was conditional upon their appearance in the court below within six weeks and furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted conditionally on surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, and agreeing to appearance in court.

Ajay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41850 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AJAY YADAV Son of Dina Yadav @ Dinanath Yadav Resident of VillageTrilokwa, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

¶5

Nandlal Yadav Son of Dina Yadav @ Dinanath Yadav Resident of VillageTrilokwa, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioners apprehend arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(b),379, 504, 506/34 IPC registered in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.

¶14

Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM XV, Gopalganj, in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41850 of 2019(2) dt.15-07-2019 2/2

¶16

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶17

ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶18

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶19

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶20

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶21

Chandran/-

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

In The Good Of Late Smt. Nirmala Sinha Vs Xxxxx

Sabir @ MD Sabir Vs The State of Bihar

Baban Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Sudisth Sah @ Sudist Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Indra Sinha Vs the State of Bihar

Durgawati Devi @ Durgawat Vs The State of Bihar