The Patna High Court dismissed this petition for anticipatory bail. The court rejected the plea, citing the gravity of the offences and the grievous injury sustained by the informant attributed to the petitioner.
Anticipatory bail petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38599 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-830 Year-2018 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria
======================================================
SABIR @ MD SABIR Son of Late Taiyab Resident of Village - Kharaiya Basti, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Araria, District - Araria
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 12-07-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38599 of 2019(2) dt.12-07-2019 2/2
privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Chandran/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 alleging grievous injury.
SABIR @ MD SABIR
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
