Criminal Miscellaneous petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed in a case involving offences under Sections 354(C), 354(D), 506 of IPC and Section 67 of IT Act. The Court vacated a prior interim order and denied bail.
Interim order granting protection to the petitioner was vacated and the application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4060 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-586 Year-2018 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Ranjit Kumar Rajak Ramphal Rajak @ Felu Rajak The resident of village/Mohalla- Salempur Saini, P.S.- Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
4 02-08-2019
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant is however present.
Petitioner in the present case is seeking anticipatory
bail in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 586/2018 registered for the offence under Sections 354(C), 354(D) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur.
Learned counsel for the informant informs that the marriage of the daughter of the petitioner has not taken place. It is submitted that the petitioner has in fact took photographs of the daughter of the informant edited the same and made them viral which has caused not only loss of reputation but has also made it difficult for the informant to arrange the marriage of his daughter.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4060 of 2019(4) dt.02-08-2019 2/2
In the given facts and circumstances, this court is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The interim order granting protection to the petitioner hereby vacated and the application is dismissed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in proceedings for offences relating to stalking and immodest demands.
Ranjit Kumar Rajak
The State Of Bihar
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
