Oral order in a writ petition challenging a provisional selection list for a food licence. The Court disposed of the application with liberty to appeal to the District Magistrate within 30 days.
The writ application was disposed of with liberty to file an appeal before the District Magistrate within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.763 of 2019
======================================================
Shiv Shankar Ram Son of Nageshwar Ram, Resident of VillageKolhaiyapatti, Raghunathpur, Ward No. 03, Block and Anchal- Murliganj, Police Station- Murliganj, District- Madhepura.
Patna High Court CWJC No.763 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 2/3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
3 01-08-2019
This writ application has been preferred for issuance
of writ of certiorari to quash and cancel the impugned Memo dated 22.09.2018 as contained in Annexure ‘4’ to the writ application by which the District Level Selection Committee under the Bihar Targeted P.D.S. (Control) Order, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the “Control Order, 2016”) has issued a provisional selection list for grant of licence.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now final selection has also been made whereunder the private respondent no. 15 has been selected.
In the writ application disputes have been raised with respect to the place of godown which had been made available by respondent no. 15 and that the petitioner being elder in age he should have been given priority in terms of the guidelines.
Learned counsel for the State submits that in the given facts and circumstances it would be only appropriate that the entire matter be examined by the District Magistrate (respondent no. 6), Madhepura afresh and a decision be taken thereon after hearing all concerned.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already represented before the District Magistrate
Patna High Court CWJC No.763 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 3/3
vide Annexure ‘3’. Learned counsel then submits that he would prefer an appeal in terms of Rule 32 of the Control Order, 2016 before the respondent no. 6 within a period of 30 days from today.
In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the writ application is being disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate appeal before the District Magistrate, Madhepura (respondent no. 6) within a period of 30 days from today.
If such an appeal is preferred, the same will be considered and disposed of within 90 days on receipt thereof, and after hearing all concerned, a reasoned order in this respect will be communicated to the petitioner immediately thereafter. All contentions are left open to the petitioner.
The writ application stands disposed of accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
Rajeev/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to dispose of the writ application to quash the selection list and grant liberty to appeal.
Shiv Shankar Ram
The Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection, Department, Government of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Madhepura
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
