Petitioners withdrew their criminal miscellaneous petition; the High Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3669 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2016 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumari Sujata Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 26-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of instant petition and the same is allowed.
Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
vikash/-
U T
Santosh Kumar Mahto @ Santosh Kumar
Sikandar Mahto
The State of Bihar
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
