The court observed that the petition had become infructuous and disposed of the matter as such without further elaboration in this short order.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3671 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2013 Thana- VIDYAPATINAGAR DistrictSamastipur
======================================================
Vindu Devi @ Bindu Devi W/o Vakil Rai, D/o Batoran Rai, R/o VillageGopalpur, Police Station- Vidyapati Nagar, District- Samastipur, presenty resident of Village- Piparpanti Keota, Police Station- Dalsingsarai, DistrictSamastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav Mr. Prabhu Narayan Prabhakar, Advocates. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Gulnar Begam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER
2 25-04-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this
petition has become infructuous and on account thereof, disposed of being infructuous.
(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J)
perwez
U T
Vindu Devi @ Bindu Devi
State Of Bihar
Vakil Rai
Aditya Kumar Trivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
