Allowed

Mukesh Jayswal v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Jun 2019CR. MISC./36486/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody for alleged offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The court allowed his release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and adhering to specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to specific conditions.

Mukesh Jayswal Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36486 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2019 Thana- MALSALAMI DistrictPatna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUKESH JAYSWAL, aged about 42 years, male, Son of Mahendra Jaysawal Resident of Mohalla - Lal Imli, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Chandra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 13-06-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2019 in connection with Special Case No. 3393 of 2019 arising out of Malsalami P.S. Case No. 141 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 30(a)/37(b)(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

¶13

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the allegation of being intoxicated condition and also with regard to recovery of 70 litres country made Mahua liquor kept on Honda motorcycle. It is submitted that the recovery has not been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the motorcycle in question does not belong to him. The petitioner has already suffered two and half months in custody. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶14

Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36486 of 2019(2) dt.13-06-2019 2/2

¶16

satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Special Case No. 3393 of 2019 arising out of Malsalami P.S. Case No. 141 of 2019, on the following conditions-

¶17

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶18

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶19

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶20

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶21

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶22

Ibrar//-

¶23

U T

Mukesh Jayswal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Jayswal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Baldev Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sunder Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Naulakh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Manoranjan Karamkar Vs The State of Bihar

Arjun Singh Kushwaha @ Arjun Singh Vs the State of Bihar