The Patna High Court granted bail to two petitioners alleged of carrying illicit liquor, releasing them on bond conditions including cooperation with investigation and physical presence in court during trials.
Released on bail requiring a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36315 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2019 Thana- CHANPATIA District-
West Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioners
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 12-06-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36315 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2
thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, West Champran, in connection with Chanpatia P.S. Case No. 82 of 2019, on the following conditions-
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Ibrar//-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners should be released on bail in connection with offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shyam Sunder Ram
Mukul Ram
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
