Allowed

Md. Saif Khan @ Md. Shoaib Khan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jun 2019CR. MISC./36332/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody since February 2019 under sections 356 and 379 IPC, against allegations of false implication and alleged recovery failure, fixing conditions including surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail via bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount under specified conditions.

Md. Saif Khan @ Md. Shoaib Khan Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36332 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2019 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. SAIF KHAN @ MD. SHOAIB KHAN, aged about 19 years, male, Son of Late Md. Chand Khan @ Md. Chand Resident of Mohalla- Madarsa Gali, Samanpura, Raja Bazar, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 12-06-2019

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2019 in

¶14

connection with Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 356 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely

¶16

implicated and in any event no recovery of the subject mobile has been made from the petitioner. The petitioner has already suffered about four months in custody. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶17

Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be

¶18

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36332 of 2019(2) dt.12-06-2019 2/2

¶20

thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-IV, Patna in connection with Shastri Nagar P.S. Case No. 120 of 2019, on the following conditions-

¶21

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶22

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶23

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶25

(Vikash Jain, J)

¶26

Ibrar//-

¶27

U T

Md. Saif Khan @ Md. Shoaib Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Saif Khan @ Md. Shoaib Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

anjani kumar singh @ anjani kumar thakur Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Sushil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Baldev Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Sunder Ram Vs the State of Bihar