Allowed

Deena Sahani @ Dina Nath Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jan 2019CR. MISC./3434/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order grants bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody in connection with a robbery case under Section 392 of the IPC involving snatching gold, silver, and mobile phones. The court imposed specific conditions, including furnishing a bail bond with sureties, regular appearance before the court, reporting to the Superintendent of Police, and conditions related to future conduct.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties of like amount each, subject to specific conditions.

Deena Sahani @ Dina Nath Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3434 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2018 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deena Sahani @ Dina Nath Sahani, son of Late Bipat Sahani @ Vipati Sahani, Resident of village-Jhakhiya, P.S-Banjariya, District-East Champaran

¶5

... Petitioner

¶6

The State Of Bihar ================	=========	Versus ... Opposite Party =============================
Appearance : For the Petitioner For the Opposite Party ================	: Mr. Mr. : Mr. =========	Y.C. Verma, Sr. Adv. with Anuj Kumar, Adv. Jagdhar Prasad, APP =============================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 25-01-2019

¶10

Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned Senior

¶11

Counsel assisted by Mr. Anuj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 30.06.2018 in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2018 for the offence alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation in the first information report is that four unknown persons in two motorcycles stopped the informant, who owns a jewelry shop, and snatched Rs.78,000/-, 60 gram gold, one kilogram silver, two mobiles and his motorcycle.

¶14

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, not named in the first information report, test identification parade has not been done so far and his name surfaced on the confessional statement of the co-accused,

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3434 of 2019(2) dt.25-01-2019 2/3

¶16

Dharamdeo Sahani, who has already been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 67129 of 2018, dated 27.11.2018. He, further, submits that the charge sheet has already been submitted, there being no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses.

¶17

However, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that as many as 18 cases are pending against the petitioner under the same offence and he is a habitual offender.

¶18

However, considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record as well as the period of custody and nature of allegations, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2018 to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the following conditions :

¶19

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.

¶20

(ii) Petitioner will appear before the learned Court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3434 of 2019(2) dt.25-01-2019 3/3

¶22

two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶23

(iii) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶24

(iv) The petitioner will appear before the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran at Motihari, in the first week of every month till a certificate of conduct is given by the Superintendent of Police, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bond.

¶25

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶26

Shamshad/-

¶27

U T

Deena Sahani @ Dina Nath Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deena Sahani @ Dina Nath Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Thakur and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Babu Sahni @ Pintu Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar.

Umid Kumar Singh @ Ummid Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar