Allowed

Rajesh Thakur and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2019CR. MISC./3193/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Criminal Miscellaneous No.3193 of 2019, the Patna High Court granted bail to petitioners Rajesh Thakur and Brajesh Thakur who are in judicial custody. The court considered the period of custody, lack of specific overt acts against them at that stage, and the fact that co-accused were previously granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions.

Rajesh Thakur and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3193 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of P.S. Case No.-194 Year-2018 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajesh Thakur and

¶5

Brajesh Thakur @ Brijesh Thakur both sons of late Janardan Thakur, resident of village-Koiriya, P.S. Dinara, District-Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 24-01-2019

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

Petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 24.08.2018 in connection with Dinara P.S.Case No.194 of 2018 for the offence alleged under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and other allied Sections of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added.

¶15

The prosecution case as lodged by the informant is that while she and her husband after dinner was sleeping in the house, the petitioners along with seven other co-accused entered the house, armed with weapons and while the co-accused ladies were order giver, co-accused Bimlesh Thakur fired on the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3193 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2019 2/3

¶17

informant’s husband on his head and thereafter co-accused Ramashish Thakur fired indiscriminately upon the husband of the informant, who after being taken to the hospital died during course of treatment.

¶18

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that he is innocent except his name figuring in the FIR no overt-act has been alleged against them. He further submits that chargesheet has already been submitted and there being no allegation of tampering with the prosecution witnesses. He further submits that the two accused ladies who were alleged to be order givers have been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.55036 of 2018 dated 10.10.2018 and one of co-accused on similar allegation has also been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr.Misc.No.68775 of 2018 dated 29.11.2018.

¶19

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioners do not have a clean antecedent and one more case is pending against them.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record as well as the period of custody and that similarly situated co-accused on similar allegations have already been granted the privilege of bail, let the petitioners, above

¶21

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3193 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2019 3/3

¶22

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Dinara P.S.Case No.194 of 2018 to the satisfaction Sri Lal Bihari Paswan, Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bikramganj (Rohtas), subject to the following conditions:-

¶23

(i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioners having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating their relationship with the petitioners.

¶24

(ii) Petitioners will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioners indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to move the learned Court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶26

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

¶27

B.Kr./-

¶28

U T

Rajesh Thakur and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Thakur and Anr. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Singh @ Ajay N. Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Shyam Babu Sahni @ Pintu Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalan Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar