Petitioner sought permission to withdraw criminal miscellaneous application pending before the S.D.J.M., Supaul, as prosecution witnesses were examined. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the application accorded; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32819 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-1988 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul
======================================================
SIKENDRA SARDAR @ SIKANDRA SARDAR, aged about 65 years (Male), Son of Bindeshwari Sardar, Resident of Village - Lalganj Tilathi, P.S.Chhatapru, District – Supaul.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Arun, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr.Sanjay Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 05-07-2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 29 of 1988, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Supaul, as the prosecution witnesses have already been examined.
Permission is accorded.
The present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U.K./-
U T
Sikendra Sardar @ Sikandra Sardar
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
