Dismissed

Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjay Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jul 2019CR. MISC./10881/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application in a case involving IPC sections 302, 307, 498A, and 326. It ordered the trial court to conclude the trial within three months and directed enforcement agencies to secure witness presence.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; trial to be concluded within three months with assistance from enforcement agencies.

Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjay Rajak Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10881 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2017 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjay Rajak Son of Jagarnath Rajak Resident of Village - Rajanpur, Vishanpur, P.S.- Mahisi, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-07-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in S.T. No.208 of 2018 arising out of Parbattha (Maraiya) P.S. case No.418 of 2017 registered under Sections 285, 307, 326, 498(A)/34, 302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Khagaria.

¶15

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 to the present application taking into account that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased and the F.I.R. is dying declaration of the deceased.

¶16

A report was called for from the court below regarding the stage of trial. It has been reported that the charge has been framed and the trial is expected to be concluded within

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10881 of 2019(3) dt.03-07-2019 2/2

¶18

a period of three months.

¶19

Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the trial, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

¶20

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

The District Magistrate, Khagaria and the Superintendent of Police, Khagaria are also directed to take necessary steps to produce the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.

¶22

Let this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Khagaria and the Superintendent of Police, Khagaria.

¶23

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶24

Narendra/-

¶25

U T

Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjay Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Rajak @ Ranjay Rajak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Khatibur Rahman @ Khatibur Raheman Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Lalu Rai @ Lallu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar