High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a matrimonial offence case involving allegations under Section 498A IPC and the D.P. Act, subject to specific conditions.
Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding presence for investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3180 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2018 Thana- BARH District- Patna
======================================================
Anant Kumar Singh, son of Pramod Kumar Singh Resident of Bakapur Mayur Chowk, P.S-Kotwali, Distt.-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his
arrest in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 277 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of the D.P. Act.
The petitioner is the husband.
The office has reported that the notice has been
served upon the opposite party no.2 but, no one is present to raise objection in the matter.
The marriage of the opposite party no.2 was solemnized with the petitioner as per the Hindu custom on 24.6.2014 and, in that event, the parents of the opposite party no.2 had given a car including costly gifts.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3180 of 2019(6) dt.10-07-2019 2/2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the car, which is complained, is standing in the name of the brother of the opposite party no.2 and the allegation made in the complaint petition is completely a concocted story.
Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 277 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
rishi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in cases under Section 498A IPC and D.P. Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anant Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Chandani Kumari
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
