Sanjay Mahto v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought relief under Section 167(2) of CrPC in a PS case. Court dismissed application as infructuous due to prior grant of bail. Oral order.
Petitioner sought relief under Section 167(2) of CrPC in a PS case. Court dismissed application as infructuous due to prior grant of bail. Oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30938 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2018 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Sanjay Mahto S/o Naresh Mahto R/o village- Asahni, P.S.- Rasulpur, DistrictSaran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Asha Kumari ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
the petitioner has already been granted bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. Hence, the present application has become infructuous.
The application is dismissed as being infructuous.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Narendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present bail application has become infructuous due to prior bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Mahto
The State of Bihar
SUDHIR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court