Allowed

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Aug 2019CR. MISC./30021/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted provisional bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences of rioting, assault with a dangerous weapon, and giving false evidence. The court directed confirmation of bail upon verification of non-grievous injury within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties granted subject to conditions and confirmation of non-grievous injury within four weeks.

Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30021 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2018 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VIKASH KUMAR Son of Shrawan Jamadar Resident of Village - Khaje Atwar Sarai, P.S.- Rahui (Bhagwn Bigha), Distt.- Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 01-08-2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 370, 307, 504 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 359/2018.

¶15

It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation of assault by as many as seven persons and the injury report discloses only two injuries on the informant’s brother. There is case and counter case between the parties. Other similarly situated co-accused Bijender Jamadar @ Bijendra Kumar and Shrawan Jamadar have been granted regular bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 8042 of 2019 and Cr. Misc. No. 8831 of 2019 respectively. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶16

Learned APP on the basis of case diary submits that the petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant’s brother with pistol butt who sustained two injuries and the opinion has been

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30021 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 2/3

¶18

kept reserved for both injuries.

¶19

Be that it may, in the event of petitioner’s arrest or surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 359/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

¶20

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

¶21

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶23

(iv) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

¶24

The provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the learned Court below upon verification within a further period of four weeks after furnishing bail bond, that no grievous injury has been caused to the informant’s brother. In case any grievous injury is found, his bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶25

Chandran/-

¶26

U T

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30021 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 3/3

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eknath Pathak Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Sah @ Sanjiv Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Vishal Vs the State of Bihar

Bijendra Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Yadav @ Nishant Shekhar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Thakur@ Vikash Kumar @Vikash Kumar Sharma Vs the State of Bihar