This order grants anticipatory bail to Bijendra Ray, who apprehends arrest for offences under Section 438 Cr.P.C, subject to conditions regarding bail sureties and conduct during the trial.
Petitioner released on bail with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, subject to specific conditions including appearance in court and cooperation with investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29987 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-989 Year-2018 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Bijendra Ray, aged about 50 years, male, S/o- Late Yadunandan Ray, Resident of Village- Gobindchak, P.S.- Sonpur, District - Saran at Chapra.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 01-08-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29987 of 2019(3) dt.01-08-2019 2/2
or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st , Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 989 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further conditions --
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Vikash Jain, J)
BT/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 504, 323, 341, 506 and 316/34 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bijendra Ray
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
